On The Web by Ircmaxell
GNU/GPL PageCache Joomla! APC php5 Lighttpd! Redhat
Home arrow Articles arrow Benchmarks arrow Lighttpd vs. Apache - Static Files
Friday, 01 June 2012
 
 
Featured Site
Main Menu
Home
Articles
Services
Portfolio
Version Information
Bug Tracker
F.A.Q.
Downloads
Forum
Contact Us
Text Link Ads
Latest Version
Feed Icon Page Cache 1.0.8 stable
Release Date: 2007-06-11
Donate!
Login
Syndicate
Lighttpd vs. Apache - Static Files
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by ircmaxell   
Friday, 18 May 2007
Article Index
Lighttpd vs. Apache - Static Files
The Scheme
Server Performance
Server Load
Conclusions

Conclusions

        These tests show that HANDS DOWN Lighttpd is more efficent and faster than Apache at serving static content.  If you extrapolate the CPU data out (given enough bandwidth), Apache will use 100% CPU at about 5,000 req/second (not too bad).  But Lighttpd will use 100% CPU to server around 18,000 req/second!!!  WOW!!!  (These are simple math problems, and do not account for things like memory bandwidth or other walls).  Not to mention that Lighttpd serves the content faster. 

         Stay tuned!  I am in the process of benchmarking Apache/Mod_PHP vs. Lighttpd/FastCGI!  Keep an eye out for this and more (including Joomla Benchmarks).



Last Updated ( Friday, 18 May 2007 )
 
Whiplash Claims - Skull Ring - Jewellery - Whiplash
 
Top! Top!
Generated in 0.92392802238464 Seconds